LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

Echoing the sentiments of a lot of folks, a letter-to-the-editor of the Key West Citizen, May 8, concerning Commissioner Scales:
Commissioner's actions were a breach of ethics

In the April 28 edition of the Citizen there is an article about attorney Ed Scales, who, while being the general counsel for Historic Tours of America, testified before a legislative subcommittee ... as the representative of the city of Key West. Attorney Scales did not advise the subcommittee that he was the attorney for one of the parties in the lawsuit involving the matter before the commission, when he testified for legislation to provide authority which would benefit his private client.

Attorney Ed Scales is quoted as saying, "... As I've stated, while I do not believe there was a conflict of interest for me to testify for the bill, I certainly can now (unfortunately, after the fact) appreciate how folks unfamiliar with the issues may perceive the appearance of one; and I don't want to, in any way, compound that appearance by any further involvement in this matter. ..."

Attorney Ed Scales is quoted as saying, "... As I've stated, while I do not believe there was a conflict of interest for me to testify for the bill, I certainly can now (unfortunately, after the fact) appreciate how folks unfamiliar with the issues may perceive the appearance of one; and I don't want to, in any way, compound that appearance by any further involvement in this matter. ..."

As someone who is familiar with the issues, including the issues of conflict of interest and legal ethics, it appears that there was a significant breach of ethics and a definite conflict of interests. Mr. Scales had two loyalties, one as the representative of the city, and the other as the representative of his primary employer, Historic Tours of America. Which concern was he representing? Clearly the position that he advocated with the Legislature (and with the city) benefited his employer. Would someone who did not have a stake in the result come to a different opinion on behalf of the city, both as a city commissioner and as a representative before the Legislature? His decision to recuse himself on any discussions of this issue should have come before his testimony, not after he has done his employer's bidding.

Wayne Dapser

Key West

 RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE