LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
The highway and driving it, as well as the issue of widening the footprint of the 18-Mile Stretch at huge taxpayer cost and unnecessary environmental damage, deserve attention, as pointed out in this August 2 Key West Citizen editorial.  More sensible driving and more traffic enforcement could go a long way toward making US1 safer.

Dangerous roadway warrants full attention

Recent wrecks on the only highway in and out of the Keys have led to the death of a number of innocent travelers from head-on collisions. These accidents leave us sorrowful and shaken.

What is to be done? Obviously, four lanes along the length of U.S. 1 would prevent some head-on collisions. But "build it and they will come," and for years the idea of four-laning throughout has been opposed, the assumption being that it would encourage an ecologically insupportable amount of daytrippers to the Keys.

Last week, undeterred by rain, 35 protesters stood outside the Plantation Key court house to bring attention to the latest plans for the 18-Mile Stretch, most notorious of U.S. 1's black spots for head-ons.

The protesters claim that plans by the Florida Department of Transportation and the Army Corps of Engineers to elevate the road over Lake Surprise and install a new, 65-foot high bridge over Jewfish Creek — with an entry-exit clover leaf — are simply too much, especially for a total price tag of $180 million.

What the protesters want is the core plan as recommended in the Miller report on the Stretch, which is to keep it two-laned but with two additions: A northbound emergency lane plus a "Jersey barrier" between the two lanes. This type of solid-concrete barrier has succeeded in eliminating fatalities along a once-bloody stretch of Route 9 in Cape Cod.

With the outcome for the Stretch still unfolding, the question remains regarding the rest of U.S. 1. What could and should be done to make travel safer?

Congestion is an obvious culprit. If the responsibility for safe driving is the driver's responsibility, how much greater is a driver's burden when the roadway has filled up beyond its anticipated capacity?

In a guest editorial in The Citizen last week, Hedley Burrell, formerly a senior media advisor to the U.S. government, tolled the bell on the automobile experiment as a whole. Switching to cleaner, cheaper fuels is not the answer to an ever-rising population of drivers, he wrote. There is a reason car makers advertise their products these days by showing them accelerating on empty roads. Because it is seductive. It is also deceptive.

So our love affair with the automobile may be wearing painfully and dangerously thin. But we still have to live with a worsening situation for the foreseeable future. So what is to be done?

It is evident that much of the frustration on U.S. 1, and the hazardous driving that results, has to do with slow drivers as surely as speeding drivers. On a rural roadway like U.S. 1, going with the flow is a life-saving lubricant to safety. We would like to see a law requiring slow drivers with a number of cars backed up behind them to pull over at the first opportunity and let them pass.

As for speeding, it has been calculated that the time difference between driving from Miami to Key West at the speed limit and driving as fast as possible is 12 minutes.

Pay attention. Use your mirror. Obey the law.

And let us know your suggestions for a safer U.S. 1.

— The Citizen

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE