LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

Though both sides are closing in on an agreement for state funding help to purchase environmentally sensitive land in exchange for Monroe County's committing to sewage projects, the deal isn't sealed.  The state questions whether the maps the county proposes to use for defining protected land are adequate.  From the January 15 Keynoter:

DCA now questions land boundaries

Sides will hash out interpretation of moratorium

By Alyson Matley amatley@keynoter.com

State Department of Community Affairs Secretary Colleen Castille on Tuesday asked Monroe County Mayor Murray Nelson to clarify terms of a deal for millions in state money for the Keys that was struck just a week ago.

"I will try to talk through a remedy to her concerns," said Nelson. "We don’t want a deal breaker and there’s no reason to have a deal breaker. Any land not protected under the moratorium, the county can move forward and try to purchase that land. I do not want to torpedo this agreement."

In a 4-1 vote Jan. 6, the County Commission agreed to impose a temporary building moratorium in some environmentally sensitive areas in exchange for state funding to buy sensitive habitat.

The moratorium calls for Monroe to retain building permit allocations under the county’s rate-of-growth ordinance, which restricts development based upon the time it takes to evacuate under threat of a hurricane.

In a letter to Nelson dated Jan. 13, Castille questions the minimum size of parcels that would be protected using some $113 million in state money.

Overall, as part of the deal to impose the moratorium, the County Commission agreed to pledge $130 million over the next few years toward wastewater upgrades and affordable housing, if the state agrees to come up with $143 million for those same crucial projects, including purchasing environmentally sensitive land.

In the letter, Castille asks Nelson to confirm her understanding of the lands that would be restricted under the moratorium.

Since the meeting, wrote Castille, county Growth Management Director Tim McGarry had e-mailed her asking for such clarification.

"[McGarry] felt that the board had intended to protect only that habitat located within the Conservation and Natural areas formerly referred to as Tier One," wrote Castille. "I believe that we must apply the moratorium countywide to ensure the habitat protection consistent with the directions of the governor and Cabinet."

Tier One lands are considered the most environmentally fragile. Tier Two lands are considered partially developed and partially buildable. Tier Three lands are where significant development has taken place, and where there are scarified lots.

Under Castille’s interpretation, the moratorium apparently would address all undeveloped Keys land.

The actual language of the conceptual proposal approved by the commission read that the county would "institute an interim moratorium on ROGO/ NROGO allocation awards in areas containing native upland vegetated lands of two acres or greater within Conservation and Natural Areas...."

Whether there is a large discrepancy between the state’s definition of boundaries and the county’s is up for interpretation.

Nelson met Tuesday with McGarry and the county’s land attorney, Jim Hendrick. Nelson says he is certain that the County Commission voted to use Tier One maps to define the moratorium.

"Those are the only maps we’ve looked at, the Tier One maps," said Nelson. "County staff says that there is less than 100 acres in Tier Two or Tier Three that could be affected under Castille’s understanding of the agreement. Still, that would be an expansion to what we agreed to."

Debra Harrison, Keys representative of the World Wildlife Fund, disagrees.

"We’re talking about hundreds, potentially thousands, of parcels," said Harrison. "The county staff interpretation had been that the two-acres-or-larger language applied to the established boundaries of Tier One. But the definition of Tier One is that the parcels included maintained a minimum of four acres. The boundary as it exists now does not include parcels under four acres."

County Planning Director Marlene Conaway told the Keynoter last week that, although most of the parcels in Tier One maps are larger than four acres, there were ways to include smaller parcels by aggregating them.

Harrison says that the few parcels that are smaller than two acres that can be connected within the current Tier One maps are incidental and that many will be lost.

Nelson said he planned to call Castille and iron out any misunderstandings.

 RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE