LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

This September 22 Key West Citizen editorial sums up the recent legislative "field hearings" in the Keys, regarding funding of purchase of environmentally sensitive land.

Land buying money must be local first, then state will follow

Two committees of the Florida House of Representatives -- Natural Resources and Local Government -- recently held two days of field hearings in the Florida Keys. This is a remarkable, unprecedented and positive event.

Tallahassee is a long way from the Keys, but the state capital plays a large role in our affairs because of the Keys' status as an Area of Critical State Concern, a status invoked in the 1970s when it became clear that local government was inclined to open the floodgates to development in an area with limited infrastructure and important natural resources.

Through the years, the county and municipal governments of the Keys have often chafed at the harness of critical concern designation and frequently there has been talk about how the Keys can once again control their own destiny and have this embarrassing ward-of-the-state label lifted.

After taking a tour of the Keys and hearing from a range of local viewpoints, it is clear that it is possible critical concern could be lifted, and that there is help we can hope for from Tallahassee. It is also clear that even under critical concern, some of our problems are up to us to solve.

Lifting Critical Concern -- and more importantly, protecting the Florida Keys environment and making this a community where we want to live -- is about more than land acquisition.

The state can offer us significant help in buying land for environmental protection, as it has done throughout the years, spending tens of millions on North Key Largo, Curry Hammock and other important areas. During the recent visit, state officials clearly said they would do all they could to use the Conservation and Recreational Lands program to buy natural areas.

State officials even said they could use state money to purchase land the county has already bought for preservation, thus giving the county money to use for other purposes, such as affordable housing and water quality improvements. And the state is willing to send help for the time-consuming and staff intensive job of actually acquiring the land, another welcome sign of cross-government cooperation.

Sending significant amounts of money and help in the next legislative session would be a good way to make this relationship stronger.

But there were other messages sent by state lawmakers and officials during the field hearings and we hope the local governments were listening.

Some of our challenges are up to us to fix, and we have to ensure that the source of our booming economy -- tourism -- is paying its fair share of the associated costs.

Monroe County has the lowest unemployment rate in Florida, just 2 percent. We don't need more development to create more jobs. We need more places for our work force to live and to stop hemorrhaging people, the constant turnover that makes our communities feel more like temporary postings than real hometowns.

The state has so far sent the Keys $17 million for water quality improvements. Yet outside of the advances made in Key West, it's hard to see the ball moving forward on that front. Stock Island is in open rebellion and the county commission does not have a coherent plan or a happy partner in wastewater projects. We must prove we can use the money responsibly before we can expect the state to hand over more of its scarce funds.

There have been many good ideas, and some promising signs of cooperation between the business community and environmentalists in the last year as the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity endgame has played out.

One important point is that the local funding sources -- to take care of environmental protection, land acquisition and affordable housing -- should be presented to voters as a package, a suite of solutions that will distribute costs and provide enough money to make significant progress. Commissioner Murray Nelson, in particular, has had an unsettling habit of suddenly presenting a "solution" and demanding that others fall in behind in support. Taking a series of piecemeal answers to the voters repeatedly is a recipe for failure.

Cooperating, planning and showing that the proposed solutions can pay for real answers to the Keys problems is the only way to get ourselves truly back in local control and provide the healthy future that the residents of the Keys deserve.

 

 RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE