LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

Wisteria Island development rears its head again...

Last time a proposal for a major development on Wisteria ("Christmas Tree") Island came up, Key Westers said "NO WAY!!!".  Well, it's baaaaaaaaaaaack... but this time the owner/developer is trying a different approach -- instead of asking Key West to annex it (it's not in the city, and therefore falls under Monroe County development rules), they want the county to make up new rules for them so they can build 75 housing units (plus a bunch of commercial development)... instead of the two residences current county rules would allow on an offshore island.  The proposal is outlined below in the May 14 Key West Citizen editorial.

A friendlier proposal for Wisteria Island?

Envisioning a private island in the Florida Keys conjures up images of swaying palm trees, lush tropical plants, soaring seabirds and pristine water teeming with marine life.

Not so when one sees Wisteria Island, the 22-acre island adjacent to Key West Harbor. A video recently produced and presented by a representative of the Bernstein family, Wisteria Island's owners, depicts an environmental nightmare. The island, in addition to becoming a home to squatters, has literally become a dumping ground. The nearshore waters and beaches are strewn with derelict vessels, and offshore, live-aboard boaters have for years sunk crude mooring devices that can damage the bay bottom below.

One wonders why an owner of an island in the Keys would allow it to fall into such a deteriorating state. However, in fairness, the island's owners have posted "no trespassing" signs. Unfortunately, to some, those are simply welcoming signs.

In 2007, the Bernstein family partnered with the Walsh family (owners of nearby Sunset Key), and asked the city of Key West to annex Wisteria Island. Annexation would have allowed for more development than allowed by Monroe County, within whose boundaries the island is located. This proposal was withdrawn as strong public outcry against the development grew. Ultimately, this public disapproval led to a voter-approved change to the Key West city charter requiring a voter referendum for any purchase or annexation of land.

Now the Bernstein family, partnering anew with the Walsh family, is asking Monroe County and the state to allow them to develop the island as a resort.

The request is complicated. The plan includes creating two mooring fields on the harbor and Gulf sides of the island. The Bernsteins propose swapping their 125 acres of environmentally sensitive submerged land to the state for rights to place 116 moorings over state submerged land. The plan also includes asking Monroe County to allow 35 single-family homes, five worker residences, 35 vacation rentals and 39,500 square feet of shops, restaurants, fuel docks and other commercial activities on the island.

That is a far cry from what is allowed under the county's offshore island zoning, which allows two homes on the island -- one per 10 acres. A new land use designation would be required to allow for such extensive development.

Development requirements for electricity, water and sewer connections, trash removal, as well as potential police and fire service, also would impact the city of Key West. And the plan would push the free anchorage used by live-aboard boaters farther northwest of Key West.

We encourage state, county and city officials to carefully evaluate the positive and negative impacts of this potential development. Public input is paramount throughout this process, and all interested parties should express their opinions regarding this development.

As with any development in its infancy, many questions are unanswered and many questions are yet to be asked.

On one hand, a cleaner and safer harbor, a professionally managed mooring field, and a moderately developed island could have a positive environmental and economic impact.

On the other hand, the owners could have cleaned up their private island and worked with federal, state and local enforcement to eliminate the hazardous debris and vessels without a development plan.

This leaves us wondering if the island and the surrounding waters were allowed to deteriorate in order to create a selling platform for Sunset Key, Part Deux.

-- The Citizen
 

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE