LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
This commentary by Key West Citizen fishing columnist Ben Iannotta was published on Independence Day:

God bless America and the environment

My kids spotted a rainbow over the mangroves the other morning on the drive to Key West. They were so excited they called me on their mother's cell phone to sing "God Bless America."

Children naturally see the link between patriotism and the environment, especially here in the Keys during the build up to the Fourth of July holiday.

Whether you're a kayaker, a fisherman or a diver, this weekend is a good time to reflect on whether our country is doing enough protect the Keys and the global environment for our children.

For what it's worth, I think we're in serious danger of letting them down.

What differentiates the United States from other nations throughout history is not the beauty of our land and waters. The children of East Germany and the Soviet Union certainly saw some magnificent rainbows during the Cold War.

What should set our country apart is our forward-looking attitude on the environment and a host of issues, an outlook backed by democratic accountability. That's what made us the most influential country in the world in the last half of the 20th Century.

Unfortunately, we in the Keys are witnessing what happens when the United States cedes its environmental leadership.

Dive operators are seeing the results of global warming everyday in the form of dying corals. Backcountry fishing guides live in fear of the next "black water" algae bloom, possibly sparked by the release of fertilizer-rich water into the Everglades under what has become a national restoration sham.

Meanwhile, mercury emitted by power plants is accumulating in the flesh of our sport fish. The same federal government that has eased standards on those plants must now warn pregnant women not to eat more than 6 ounces of tuna a week.

To rationalize these environmental transgressions, you have to accept the contorted argument that we eventually will reduce pollution by allowing more of it. It's fashionable in Washington D.C. to talk about the power of market forces to clean up the planet. American industry will regulate itself, the delusion goes. You've seen the ads: "We live here too."

This is, of course, naïve. It's also a waste of corporate ingenuity. I want American companies working on solutions to spam, building power-grids that don't fail, developing cars that get 70 miles to the gallon and outboard motors that are quiet and lightweight. I don't want them trading pollution allocations and brainstorming ways around environmental laws.

Our national environmental policies have become the equivalent of a slowly exploding dirty bomb, and at the moment, not many voters are getting it.

The George Washington University recently asked voters to name the "No. 1 problem" the next president should deal with. The top two answers were terrorism and the economy, tied at 16 percent. "The environment scored an asterisk," said Chris Arterton, Dean of GW's Graduate School of Political Management.

There's nothing wrong with those numbers so far. Even I would not list the environment before terrorism as the most critical issue facing the country. Here's the surprise: when voters were asked to pick the next most important issue, only 5 percent chose the environment.

It seems that for many people, the environment is a local issue rather than a national issue, Arterton explained.

The silver lining in the polls is that even a small percent of environmental patriots could make the difference in the presidential election, especially here in closely divided Florida. I plan to remember that rainbow.

biannotta@aol.com

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE