LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
Mighty strange, recent doings at HARC.   The judges who recently decided against the City and the Watermark developers didn't find any ambiguity in the HARC 2 1/2 story rule, but it seems some of the HARC commissioners wanted to change it.   For now, at least, they seem to have backed off.  From the February 3 Solares Hill:

HARC Steps Back From a Steep Path

 by Mark Howell

Following an inconclusive end to the meeting of the Historic Architectural Review Commission last week (“HARC Grapples With New Rules,” Solares Hill, Jan. 27), the city attorney has sent the commission’s chairman a Dear John letter regarding their mutual effort to redesign its ordinances.

The January 27 letter was sent to chair George Born. Here is the missive in its entirety:

Dear George:

Last fall, you and I talked about HARC undertaking a review and updating of its governing ordinances.  Our discussion stemmed from HARC having some difficulty with its criteria for deciding applications for demolition permits and certificates of no contributing value. We started to address these items at the first public workshop on December 13, 2005, and had a productive meeting. As we turned into the new year, however, the ordinance review effort became entangled with Watermark and its two-and-a-half story guideline issue.

May I recommend that we halt the ordinance review process and cancel the February 14 workshop?  HARC has been sidetracked down a steep path we had no intention of taking. It is frustrating and difficult (at least for me) to try to function in this atmosphere.  Perhaps we might try again at a later time.

Very truly yours,

Robert Tischenkel

City Attorney

P.S. Please address future correspondence for me to “City Hall Punching Bag.”

The letter was copied to the mayor and the commissioners; to the city manager, Julio Avael; to HARC director Diane Silvia; to Mark Howell of Solares Hill and to Tim O’Hara of The Key West Citizen. 

The day after last week’s HARC meeting came news that the Watermark mentioned in Tischenkel’s letter had hit the wall. On Wednesday, Jan. 25, the 3rd District Appellate Court in Miami dismissed two appeals filed by Watermark developer Caroline Street Partners and by the City of Key West. 

That same day, local environmental group Last Stand presented its Outstanding Activist Award at the group’s annual meeting.  Attorneys Bob Goldman and Eric Dadd were honored for their work in preventing the Watermark project from overwhelming the Key West Bight with an illegal number of stories. 

The plaintiffs in the case were neighbors who filed a petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari against the city, which was heard in August by Monroe County Circuit Court Judge Richard Payne, who ruled against the developers.  The case was appealed by both the developers and the city, and the three-judge panel once again ruled with the neighbors, tossing out the appeals. It was with the help of Last Stand that the neighbors were able to raise funds for legal expenses in filing the petition and preparing to fight the appeal; Goldman and Dadd took only minimal monetary compensation.

Donald Craig, a developer on the Watermark project who also serves on HARC, has been pushing to amend the 2.5 story limit on new construction in the Historic District. The meeting to continue that discussion is the workshop canceled at the request of the city attorney.

Craig is not the only member of the HARC board to have an interest in real estate. HARC’s staff director, Diane Silvia, is a licensed realtor at Prudential, where HARC commissioner Marilyn Wild is a broker.

A resident of Old Town, Janet Hartwell, wrote an open letter to HARC this week that comes to a heartfelt conclusion: “Members of HARC, you are the stewards of our Historic District and by default the stewards of Key West itself. The ongoing assault by developers threatens the economy of our entire island. I urge you to take a stand now to ensure that the rules and regulations remain strong and intact. If possible, strengthen them even further. Close any loopholes and make sure no other ones appear. Stop, once and for all, this shameless sellout to the highest, the cleverest, the most devious bidder.”

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE