Judge nixes Old Town rental
transfers
| |
| BY TIMOTHY O’HARA |
|
Citizen Staff |
A circuit court
judge on Monday said the Key West City Commission violated its
comprehensive land-use plan when it created a new housing
category for seasonal homeowners to rent to tourists. The change
subsequently allowed developer Pritam Singh to transfer rental
rights from a former New Town hotel into Old Town residential
neighborhoods.
Circuit Court Judge
David Audlin quashed a January ruling by the City Commission,
acting as the Board of Adjustment, that would have allowed Singh
to transfer rental rights from the Hampton Inn on North
Roosevelt Boulevard to homes owned by seasonal residents and
other properties along Simonton and Petronia streets. The rights
became available because the new development, Parrot Key,
contains fewer units than the now-demolished hotel.
In creating the
“second homes” category, the city argued that homes can be
rented to tourists if the owners have not lived in them
full-time during the past five years. The judge ruled that
illegal, saying, “Housing units for permanent residents does not
only mean housing units in which permanent residents have
resided in the last five years.”
Audlin wrote: “The
Board of Adjustment’s definition of the phrase ‘housing units
for permanent residents’ to exclude a finding of the
displacement of permanent residents when ‘during the past five
years, the unit was licensed as a transient rental unit or the
unit was occupied primarily by seasonal residents, tourists,
migrant or transitory workers or similar short-term visitors’ is
fundamentally inconsistent with the comprehensive plan.”
Lawyers for the
city, Singh and the Key West-based environmental group Last
Stand pleaded their cases before Audlin on Friday. Last Stand
filed a lawsuit in February challenging the Board of
Adjustment’s decision. “Last Stand is pleased for the victory of
the citizens of Key West,” said Al Sullivan, the group’s board
president. Last Stand attorney Eric Dadd added, “The conclusions
the judge came up with were nearly directly in line with Last
Stand’s arguments.”
Last Stand argued
the new category violated the comp plan because the document
contains sections designed to protect permanent housing and
limit units that can be rented for less than 28 days. The plan
prohibits the number of transient rentals from exceeding 25
percent of the city’s total equivalent of single family homes.
A 2005 Planning
Department report stated 32 percent of the city’s dwellings
already were transient rentals, a figure City Planning Director
Gail Kenson cited when she denied Singh’s proposal. He appealed
to the Board of Adjustment, which overruled her.
“I think the
court’s interpretation was correct and was the same
interpretation I had when I voted on the issue,” said
Commissioner Bill Verge, who was the only commissioner to vote
against the transfer. “Basically, I’m trying to protect my
district. District I has become a dumping ground for anything
tourist-related, while other districts are protected from it.
Although there are businesses located there, people need to
remember that District I is primarily residential.”
Last Stand and
local residents raised concerns about the potential of
developers moving rental rights from redeveloped hotels into
historically residential neighborhoods. For years, the city
fought with the owners of homes in Truman Annex to prohibit
short-term rentals, before finally allowing some transient
rentals in the gated neighborhood.
Since the Board of
Adjustment ruling, Singh has transferred two rental rights from
the hotel, and planned to transfer several others to a
neighborhood along Simonton and Greene streets.
Singh’s planner who
helped craft the city resolution, Owen Trepanier, did not return
telephone messages left Monday evening.
The City Commission
is slated to hear an appeal tonight from Betty and John
Hettinger, who objected to the transfer of rental rights to
their neighbors’ home at 707 Simonton St. Dadd, the Last Stand’s
attorney, said he has conferred with the Key West City
Attorney’s Office, and thinks the appeal will be postponed until
the city decides whether to appeal Audlin’s ruling.
tohara@keysnews.com
|