LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
The judge in our legal case to block an across-the-board development increase in the Keys released her ruling June 30.  She ruled against us.  Needless to say, Last Stand is very disappointed in the ruling.  Look for more information on our website later, but some of the details are reported in this article from the July 1 Key West Citizen:

County wins on land-use challenge

BY LAURIE KARNATZ

Citizen Staff

A state hearing officer on Thursday ruled that changes to county land-use rules support goals to protect the environment while taking care of the Keys economy.

The ruling rejects assertions made by attorneys for two environmental groups that challenged the proposed rules, which were crafted by state and county officials more than a year ago.

"We're reading through it to analyze the finer points," said Assistant County Attorney Bob Shillinger. "But it appears the county was victorious in all aspects. That's good news for Monroe County and its citizens."

The rules would, among other things, allow the reinstatement of hundreds of building permits —165 in unincorporated Monroe and 65 in Marathon — withheld by the state over the past decade because of the county's failure to implement its land-use plan and related five-year work program in a timely manner. The work program is now a 10-year program.

It also would raise the number of residential building permits allowed in unincorporated Monroe each year from 158 to 197 with at least 71 of those set aside for affordable housing. In Marathon, the number would rise from 24 to 30 with six set aside for affordable housing.

"That's very exciting news for the whole Keys and I'm thrilled to see this happen," said entrepreneur and affordable housing advocate Ed Swift.

In her ruling, Administrative Law Judge Carolyn S. Holifield found that the challengers, Last Stand and the Florida Keys Citizens Coalition, "would prefer that the [state] continue its past policy of mandating work program items and imposing penalties on local governments that fail to make substantial progress on those items. Since that past policy has not been successful, it cannot be concluded that the [state] acted arbitrarily or capriciously in choosing to endorse the Partnership Agreement and amend the City of Marathon and Monroe County Comprehensive Plans and Land Development Regulations accordingly."

"God save the Florida Keys. No one else with any power is willing to," said attorney Richard Grosso, who represented the two civic groups in the legal proceeding.

Grosso and Ed Davidson, president of the Citizens Coalition, said Thursday the ruling isn't the end of legal challenges to the proposed rules.

"It's by no means over," said Davidson. "We're confident that we have many compelling legal points that will be supported in the appeals process."

The rules at issue, for unincorporated Monroe and Marathon, were crafted in large part by then-county Mayor Murray Nelson and designed to bring hundreds of millions of dollars into the Keys for land conservation, sewer upgrades and new housing. They were approved last spring by Gov. Jeb Bush and the Cabinet.

But the challengers argued that the change violates requirements of the state's Growth Management Act. It also violates the findings of the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study, a $6 million project that was designed to determine how much additional growth the environmentally sensitive island chain could sustain, they said.

"The last time we challenged the [land-use] plan, the reason we lost was because they had put in this requirement that the Carrying Capacity Study [wasn't complete] and they would change the rate of growth when it was done," said Grosso. "Fast forward to the day of reckoning and they don't reduce, they actually increase the rate of growth. It's the classic bait and switch."

Grosso also said there could be problems because much of the ruling was based on a new system of valuing property for environmental purposes. Holifield's ruling relied on a system of three tiers ranging from the most to the least environmentally sensitive.

The County Commission earlier this month eliminated the middle tier.

"She says all this stuff about protecting habitat with the tier system" when one of the tiers has been eliminated, he said.

Nelson, who had a large hand in the rule change, did not return a call for comment.

lkarnatz@keysnews.com

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE