LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

County Commission getting farther from doing the right thing, by (incorrectly) insisting funding for buying environmentally sensitive land must be in hand before rules can be fine-tuned to enhance habitat protection.  This is a gross misinterpretation; nobody is proposing any less building - just to direct it where it should have been directed all along.  This 7/18 Keynoter article summarizes the 7/15 BOCC hearing which was the subject of our recent Action Alert.

Building moratorium again put on the shelf

Now the issue is getting money to buy property

By Alyson Matley amatley@keynoter.com

As Monroe County Growth Management goes back to the drawing board yet again with a plan to protect the most sensitive lands of the Keys, division Director Tim McGarry says the most recent proposal to do so was "just not ripe yet."

In its second appearance before the County Commission, a proposal to temporarily halt development on critical habitat was again continued this week.

Commissioners asked county staff to come up with a list of possible funding sources to purchase such lands before they would consider endorsing a moratorium on even the most sensitive lands.

"I will support a moratorium if we can get a reoccurring funding source," said Commissioner Murray Nelson.

In June, Growth Management offered a plan, endorsed by the Planning Commission, that would delay building on highly sensitive and moderately sensitive lands for between 12 and 18 months. That, they said, would allow the county time to modify its land development regulations to come into compliance with the Florida Keys Carrying Capacity Study. The study required changing current land development regulations and permitting processes to strengthen the protection of sensitive habitat.

The work plan for the study set a July deadline for the county to begin adopting changes in land-use plan "to ensure that new development does not exceed the carrying capacity of the county’s natural environment," according to the study. If the state mandate is not heeded, the county risks losing some or all of its building permit allocations.

This past week, staff introduced a proposal that would delay building permits on only the most sensitive land. The wary commission, however, asked that staff come up with a list of possible funding sources before they take any sort of action.

"We need more public input and review," McGarry told the Keynoter. "We still think it will be the most fair approach. If we don’t get a moratorium, I would like the [commission] to identify the Tier 1 areas as conservation natural areas – the primary ones to go after [in land acquisition]. If the board commits, that will put the state on notice that we’re serious."

McGarry says the issue of lost building permit allocations is still up in the air.

"That’s up to the governor and Cabinet. We’ve made a lot of progress in the program. There are other concerns – further land degradation. Staff still recommends some sort of moratorium. It would reduce the pressure on upland habitat, and it would allow time to get the funding sources together. Regulations don’t protect these lands; we have to buy them."

McGarry says he’s confident the county will come up with a way to conserve delicate hammock without risking losing the already limited number of building allocations granted by the state.

"I think they will give us the allocations next year," he said, "although hurricane evacuation is still a problem. Right now we have 158 for unincorporated Monroe County. Normally we have 197. We lost 20 percent from a few years ago when we hadn’t made substantial progress. Were trying to play catch-up. But you can’t sewer all of the Keys in 10 years."

 

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE