LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

Key West Citizen article (7/16) on latest twist in Runway Safety Area (RSA) saga:  FAA wants EIS, which would cost county millions and delay safety enhancement.  EMAS, which Last Stand recommends, and Monroe County voted to use, would provide safety upgrades fastest and with minimum environmental impact.

County to challenge mandate for airport study

By TRAVIS JAMES TRITTEN

keysnews.com

The county will challenge a federal requirement that it spend years and millions of aviation dollars to examine Key West International Airport safety measures.

New safety areas at each end of the runway could protect planes that skid out of control, but would also mean bulldozing some of the island's last wetlands and a cost of $24 million.

Two studies have found that the runway safety plan would be environmentally degrading, and despite an alternative plan offered by the county, the Federal Aviation Administration is requiring that another major study be completed before a decision is made.

"The choice that I would recommend is that we do appeal it," Airport Director Peter Horton said. "It is difficult, frankly, for me to take this kind of stance against the FAA."

The majority of the county commission agreed with Horton.

The next step will be to send an appeal letter to the FAA regional office in Atlanta. If the appeal is denied, the county could take its case to the head FAA office in Washington, according to Horton.

The FAA did not reject an alternate proposal by the county to place an engineered materials arresting system at one end of the airport in place of the 1,000-foot-by-500-foot grassy safety area.

The EMAS, supported by environmental groups, is a 410-foot-by-116 foot pad made up of hollow blocks that bog down landing gear and stop planes without injury. The FAA-approved system is used at airports that have no space to build safety areas due to natural and manmade boundaries.

The county sent the proposal in April along with a feasibility study that showed the larger runway safety areas would destroy some of Key West's last remaining wetlands and cost about $24 million.

It was the same alternative the county called for in an earlier study, Horton said.

"We thought at that point what would be most practical would be EMAS on the east and nothing on the other," he said.

The larger runway safety areas would remove a combined 25 acres of the salt ponds area at the west end of the runway and mangrove forest at the east end.

The county would be required to spend $14 million to buy other property -- as far away as Ohio Key -- for conservation to make up for leveling the wetlands.

 

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE