LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
Tearing up the Tier System

The Monroe County Commission severely botched up the already compromised "tier system" for ranking undeveloped land (in unincorporated Monroe) for suitability for building or conservation.  As it was devised, the three-tier system would have been an improvement over the present system of allocating building permits.  But when they adopted the Tier System June 14, the BOCC eliminated Tier Two (the middle tier) and made all Tier Two parcels Tier Three (the most "buildable").  Not only does that weaken the protection of remaining fragments of hardwood hammock and pineland forests, it makes all those lots considerably more buildable, which means they're worth more.  It's a windfall for the current owners of Tier Two property, but in the long run won't do much for affordability of housing.

That point is made in this editorial from the June 17 News-Barometer, the Lower Keys weekly paper from Big Pine Key.  (The "we" used by the editorial writer is a collective "we", meaning our county commissioners.)

[Note the italicized bold sentence near the bottom.  That refers to Commissioner Murray Nelson's erroneous statement at the June 14 meeting that "the environmental groups" are to blame for the county's lack of sufficient progress in addressing issues of affordable housing, wastewater, and conservation land purchase.  He was referring to Last Stand (and FL Keys Citizens Coalition)'s legal challenge to an increase in the growth rate because of a multi-year failing of the county to make the required progress on those issues.  That is the only part of the county/state agreement we challenged -- the rewarding of the county for progress not yet made.  A decision in that case is still pending.]

Logic has left building

Inverse logic, convenient memories, and convoluted thinking seem to permeate the discussions of the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners these days. What, you might ask, makes now any different from other times?

Very little would have to be the truthful response. But the contrary logic and factual content of our reports from county leadership just don't seem to mesh with any form of reality we have come to expect.

The current fight over the controversial Tier System is one case in point. In a totally unexpected move, and one sure to spawn legal challenges, commissioners voted to dump one of three land designations, and reduce it to just two.  The logic behind this, as we heard in meeting after meeting, was so that property owners weren't placed at a competitive disadvantage with their neighbors when it comes time to sell the property. It was also opined that if more land is made available that can actually be developed into residential units, it might actually bring the cost of a buildable lot in Monroe County down from the rafters to somewhere around the window sills.

We can understand not setting up unfair competitive programs for land owners. Our question has to be, "Why does ROGO stay in place?" There isn't a soul in the county who doesn't know ROGO is so weighted toward the wealthy that unless you come well-heeled to the table, you will probably not have the strength to build once your number comes up.

In a nutshell, the Tier System was originally designed to direct development away from lots that were considered more environmentally sensitive than their neighboring properties, and direct future growth into areas where more building had already taken place, more land was scarified, and less environmentally valuable land would be destroyed to make way for million-dollar homes.

Tier One lands were those where building was discouraged, lying mostly on sensitive lands of high value to the Keys ecosystem. Tier Three lands were those of little value to the ecosystem, where building already was well underway, and more encouraged. Tier Two lands were those where some building had taken place, the lots contained environmental sensitivities, and were designed to present a buffer between the pristine and the totally scarified.

It was Tier Two the commissioners elected to junk, eliminating the buffer zone and offering up another 1,500 buildable lots. For the growth community, this makes sense. We'll withhold judgment on the big picture for now.

Our real problem arises when commissioners tie affordable housing to the creation of 1,500 more buildable lots. The sentiment here was if there were more buildable lots, the county could purchase and build on more of them at a cheaper price without spending mega-bucks on mitigation.

Let's examine that a little more closely. The price of a buildable dry lot in Monroe County starts at around $120,000. That could be because there are only so many. That could also be because that's what the market will bear. Lots that were previously designated Tier Two, are now considered buildable lots. So now, instead of thousands of lots that can achieve permits by simply purchasing them, we now have 1,500 more lots.
In today's real estate market, how can any commissioner believe the price will reduce drastically enough to make a serious difference?

And what stops the moneyed from now purchasing all the buildable lots? The answer: Nothing.

We are also told that environmental groups that have challenged the county's agreement with the state for more money to buy lands, sewer the county, and build affordable housing, have cost us $8 million extra to buy those lands because the county was unable to buy them. In fact, we're told that the commission authorized the purchase of 100 lots each year upon which to allow the development of affordable housing.

Excuse us?

The pot of money used to buy those lands has never changed. In fact it increases with each passing month. How much land have we bought?

Next to nothing.

And now we've made Tier Two lands, which could have been purchased more cheaply, as pricey as Tier Three. Excuse us again.

We are also told that there are no permits to be used to develop workforce housing. The pot of affordable housing ROGO allocations has remained virtually untouched in the last two years. According to most county staffers, the demand for single-family, one-unit workforce housing allocations has no waiting list. Excuse us again.

Once we strip the spin and whitewash from these arguments, none of them hold much substance.

We could have bought land. We had permits to use. We chose not to. 

And then we have the audacity to blame the environmental community for standing up and being heard.

We can conclude only one thing from all this. Instead of progress, we would rather punish folks for not agreeing with us, point fingers of blame, and then sit back and watch the market rate housing money machine continue to churn.

Illogical. Convoluted. Just plain idiotic from many points of view.

 RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE