LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

Red flags have been raised by quibbling arising over just what land the county proposes to protect by measures it tentatively agreed to take (temporary moratorium followed by seriously strengthened permanent protection).  The watered-down measures the BOCC agreed to January 6 could be very weak, and Commissioner Neugent's protest vote against the measure deserves a lot of respect.  (His stated reason for voting against it was that it was too weak.)  A January 9 Key West Citizen editorial:

Magically morphing moratorium falls flat

The limitless creativity of people of the Florida Keys is embodied in many ways -- colorful subtropical watercolors, quirky sculpture, insightful local literature and even the eyebrow-raising "Conch Cruisers" rumbling along Keys roads.

At times, it seems this depth of creativity extends to local politics, where public business often appears to include elements of both whimsy and illusion.

Such may be the case with Tuesday's meeting of the Monroe County Commission where, in a cloud of confusion, county staff and commissioners maneuvered to dodge a punitive bullet from Gov. Jeb Bush and the Florida Cabinet.

The state is -- and has been -- threatening to tighten the drag on Keys development by 20 percent if the county does not show it is making substantial progress toward complying with its 2010 Comprehensive Plan. On Dec. 16, the governor and Cabinet determined that the county fell short of that goal due to its failure to protect native habitat from development, and due to its less-than-stellar progress toward building wastewater-treatment systems.

Last year, the county created so-called "tier" maps prioritizing what lands need protection, but it chose not to impose a development moratorium on the most environmentally valuable of those parcels. Mayor Murray Nelson has publicly stated that NOT imposing a moratorium was among the wisest things the commission accomplished in 2003.

Obviously, wisdom is malleable. The mayor and three other commissioners voted Tuesday to create an ordinance temporarily banning development on parcels of environmentally sensitive uplands (wetlands already are protected under federal law) 2 acres or larger. Or it seemed that is what they approved.

The first red flag was a poorly worded motion -- made on the fly-- that would protect parcels of "native uplands vegetative land" 2 acres or greater. Most of us laypersons would assume the commission's wording pretty much accomplished the stated goal. But those who long have dealt with county government know that the devil frequently resides in the details, and in this case the details were unspecified.

Environmental activists had sought protection for parcels 1 acre or larger. The county was thinking more along the lines of 4 acres or larger. State Department of Community Affairs Secretary Colleen Castille, who has been attending a lot of Keys meetings lately, said the state would accept a compromise of 2 acres or larger.

Vote taken; mission accomplished. Maybe.

One of those unstated details was how the county would determine exactly what parcels were protected. It appears the mayor and county Growth Management Director Tim McGarry assumed it would be determined by the county's Conservation and Natural Areas Map, which includes the most sensitive "tier" from the previously drafted tier maps.

Seems reasonable. That is, until you consider that a criteria used to designate "Tier 1" lands was that they are 4 acres or larger -- with the exception of a few small parcels that connect larger parcels.

Say, wasn't that what the county wanted in the first place, before the "2-acre" compromise?

Never mind that Secretary Castille had specified that the protected lands should be determined by Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Gap Maps. These are the maps the state uses to target lands for conservation purchases.

Surely the county wouldn't be trying to trick the governor and Cabinet. Would it?

After Tuesday's meeting, Castille immediately lifted a state "notice of violation," thinking the commission had made a good faith effort to redeem its formerly recalcitrant self. Now we are told that she is drafting a letter to the county, clarifying the state's expectations.

If this tale ever culminates in a moral, that might be: "Stop fooling with Mother Nature -- and the governor, Mr. Mayor.

 RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE