LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

The effectiveness of the recent (and still tentative) agreement to limit development in prime wildlife habitat hangs on what land gets protected.  The threshold for how small a chunk of wildlife habitat comes under protection is fundamental to its effectiveness.  The state and the environmental community (including Last Stand) called for a one-acre threshold.  The county wanted 4, but settled on 2, but not everyone agrees that the county's maps are detailed enough to make that determination.  From the January 9 Key West Citizen:

Mayor says building ban includes 2-acre lots

BY TRAVIS JAMES TRITTEN

keysnews.com

After months of balking and political wrangling, the county decided Tuesday to temporarily ban building on its natural lands.

But there is disagreement among county commissioners and environmentalists on which parcels of natural land will get protection. And whose maps will be used to identify those lands.

The state negotiated a 2-acre size requirement Tuesday as part of a deal that could spare the county penalties for its lackluster environmental record in 2003. The county pushed for a ban on areas that are 4 acres or larger.

County Mayor Murray Nelson attempted to lay the moratorium questions to rest Thursday with a firm definition, which says county maps will be used.

"It is the [land] in the natural conservation areas that are 2 acres or more and are considered hammock," Nelson said.

Two of Nelson's fellow commissioners and some environmentalists say that the maps only show land that is 4 acres or larger -- one criterion for making the conservation list -- and a few of the smaller lots.

Gov. Jeb Bush and the Florida Cabinet will review the moratorium at the end of the month to determine if the county has made progress on conservation. As an Area of Critical State Concern, the Keys are required to make progress on land conservation and other issues every year. The deadline for Monroe County to take conservation action was last month but the Cabinet allowed a one-month extension to find a last-minute fix.

The Department of Community Affairs has been working with the county for months to come up with a plan to protect natural lands, as well as upgrade sewers and build affordable housing. If the Florida Cabinet finds the responsibilities were not met, it can limit the number of homes residents can build each year.

Some say those new county conservation maps are inaccurate and omit important, threatened natural habitat. They were created last year when commissioners first began discussing a moratorium.

The omissions leave hundreds or thousands of patches of native forest in danger of being bulldozed, said Debra Harrison, South Florida program director for the World Wildlife Fund. During consideration of the moratorium on Tuesday, many environmental activists claimed that even 1-acre patches of native vegetation can provide critical habitat for Florida Keys animal species.

"The majority of the lands that we intended to be protected under the county's action will not be protected," Harrison said.

Nelson denied claims that the maps do not show many 2- and 3-acre parcels of land, and that those areas could slip through the cracks of the county protection plan.

"[County] Growth Management feels they have good handle on areas of 2 acres," he said.

The moratorium plan changed several times Tuesday while the county commission and the state Department of Community Affairs negotiated terms.

"I think it is an honest confusion," said Commissioner David Rice, who voted in favor of the moratorium, believing the county's maps would not be used.

DCA Secretary Colleen Castille mentioned using state maps that outline habitat by quality not size during the meeting, and Rice said he believes she left the conference room believing the county would proceed using those.

"I voted on that [moratorium] based on the assumption that we will honor that request," he said.

Castille was not available for comment Thursday.

The only dissenting vote came from Commissioner George Neugent, who said he voted no because he believed the moratorium would leave out important habitat.

Several sources said they believed Castille was aware of the confusion and planned to contact the county today.

 

 RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE