LAST STAND

 

 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

Say what???  Assistant Secretary of the Navy B.J. Penn says that because the aircraft are home-based elsewhere, their impact here doesn't count.  How much sense does that make?  Details are in the following article from the December 29 Key West Citizen:
Navy: Legal requirements met for jets

County leader seeks suspension of Super Hornet training


BY TIMOTHY O’HARA
Citizen Staff

An assistant secretary of the Navy is satisfied the Navy conducted all studies required by law in 2003 before allowing F/A-18 fighter jets to train regularly at the Boca Chica airfield, dismissing a request by a Florida Keys group and its attorney for more studies and a review of the aircraft.

Environmental attorney Richard Grosso, who represents the Florida Keys Citizens Coalition, last month sent a letter to Assistant Secretary for Navy Installations and Environment B.J. Penn, asking him to review the Navy’s study on F/A-18 Super Hornets training at Naval Air Station Key West.

Grosso, who wrote the letter on behalf of the coalition and Key Largo resident John Hammerstrom, contends the Navy’s review was not specific enough to satisfy the concerns of people who live around the military installation, and the creation of the base’s flight maps were done with software that does not accurately project the jets’ noise levels.

In Penn’s response, he states the Navy complied with the National Environmental Policy Act and used the “most accurate” and Department of Defense-approved software for creating the flight maps, which are known as Air Installation Compatible Use Zones, or AICUZ.

Monroe County Commissioner Sylvia Murphy on Friday sent an e-mail to U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson asking for his help in suspending Super Hornet flights “until a proper and legal Environmental Impact Statement can be performed.”

“I feel that it is inexcusable for Monroe County to allow its itizens to be treated in this manner,” Murphy said. “We would be remiss as public servants should we allow this harmful treatment to continue to be inflicted upon the very people we are sworn to protect.

The introduction of an aircraft emitting almost four times the noise of its predecessor, into a neighborhood, has the potential to have significant environmental impacts to surrounding communities.”

The Navy completed an “environmental assessment” for Fleet Support and Infrastructure Improvements in 2003, which stated there was “no significant mpact” to “off-base noise exposure.”

The Navy did not do a more thorough and Lower Keys-specific “environmental impact statement” because the Super Hornets train at Boca Chica but are based elsewhere, according to a letter Penn wrote to Grosso, which Naval Air Station Key West base spokesman Jim Brooks released Friday. The planes were engaged in some training over the Lower Keys as early as 2002, Brooks said.

“The state of Florida, local government and the U.S. Navy continue to work closely together to ensure the health, safety and welfare of our citizens and visitors while preventing incompatible land-use and unintended consequences from transient aircraft operations at NAS Key West,” Penn wrote. “The Navy takes seriously its environmental protection responsibilities as well as the public’s perception of how well those responsibilities are met.

We can assure you that in our continuing operations at NAS Key West, thoughtful consideration of impacts from our aircraft operations will continue to be emphasized.”

Grosso had asked the Navy to back up that assertion with documentation. However, Penn’s 1 1/2-page letter does not provide any back-up documentation.

“I was particularly disappointed that Assistant Secretary Penn failed to explain how it is possible for a much louder airplane, flying more operations to cause no impact,” Hammerstrom wrote in an e-mail to The Citizen on Friday. “The Navy claims that their obligation to evaluate the impact of the F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet is satisfied by their April 14, 2003, ‘Finding of No Significant Impact’ letter. The Navy has refused to explain how that could possibly be true, since the document does not even mention the airplane.”

Hammerstrom and Murphy took issue with Penn’s statement that the Navy has complied with National Environmental Policy Act requirements because the planes are not based in Key West.

“It is insulting to those who live with the greater noise of the Super Hornet to imply that the impact is dependent on where the airplane parks,” Hammerstrom said. “Those most unfairly affected by the Navy’s failure to recognize the significantly louder noise levels that have resulted from the Navy’s replacement of the F14 [Tomcat] with the F/A-18 E/F [Super Hornet] are those folks who, in good conscience, purchased property outside of the published noise zones and now find themselves effectively inside of the noise zones because of the much greater noise levels.”

Hammerstrom has sent similar requests for further review to the Government Accountability Office and the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General.

Penn’s letter, which calls for compatible development around the base, comes as the county has given the go-ahead for two more residential developments within the AICUZ noise zones. The commission, on Dec. 19, approved a project that calls for Habitat for Humanity to build 10 to 12 units of affordable housing off
U.S. 1 on Big Coppitt Key.

The commission also gave county Land Authority Director Mark Rosch direction to look into acquiring one acre on Big Coppitt Key so that Old Town Key West Development Group can build 23 homes for working families. The Navy objected to both projects, citing concerns about jet noise.

“If you build this development, there will be residents in yards that will not be able to hear each other speak when jets are flying,” Key West Naval Air Station Executive Director Ron Demes said of the Habitat for Humanity project. “There will be residents that will not be able to hear televisions inside their homes.”

The Planning Board next month will review the AICUZ issue and determine whether the county needs to adopt them as part of its future land-use regulations.

tohara@keysnews.com

 

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE