LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
The Appeals Court decision upholding Judge Payne's ruling in favor of the Key West Bight neighborhood against Watermark is an important win for the neighbors as well as for the rules. 

The Key West Citizen editorial, January 31:

Neighborhood and rules win in Bight decision

Residents of the Key West Bight neighborhood are still celebrating last week's decision by the Third District Court of Appeals that effectively handed them victory in their two-year fight against a massive condominium complex planned for the old Jabour's Trailer Court property in the heart of the seaport district.

There will still be a Watermark condominium complex, and it will bear little resemblance to the funky trailer park that occupied the site for decades.

But residents won on a very important point — that the city has rules about what can be built in the historic district, and that those rules must be followed.

The issue at the heart of the case was a guideline of the city's Historic Architectural Review Commission, the panel that must approval all projects in the city's world-famous historic district.

That guideline says projects "must not exceed 2.5 stories." The extra half-story is intended to be an attic-like space, like those in the island's thousands of Classic Revival, shotgun and eyebrow houses.

Watermark's developers enterprisingly interpreted the rule to mean 2.5 stories over a ground-level parking area and they persuaded HARC and the City Commission to go along with their interpretation.

And they argued that a mere guideline for an advisory board did not count when the City Commission had approved the plan.

But neighbors opposed to the project, which they said was too large in mass and scale for the surrounding community, took their case to court. Last August, Monroe Circuit Judge Richard Payne ruled in their favor. This week, the appeals court upheld his decision. The developers say they are now redesigning the project.

Payne made a similar ruling in a similar case recently, this one regarding the proposed redevelopment of the Atlantic Shores resort. In that ruling, he displayed refreshing common sense and everyday logic in simply reading the rules.

"This court is firmly of the opinion that resort[ing] to expert opinion and agency interpretation to interpret the meaning of the phrase 'Height — must not exceed 2.5 stories' is unwarranted and unnecessary," Payne wrote in the Atlantic Shores case.

We agree. There is a lot of money at stake in Key West development these days, and for far too long high-priced attorneys have had their way with public processes.

This time, they ran into determined and organized opposition, a group of neighbors who believed in the city's rules and believed in the legal system to do the right thing.

They were right. Congratulations to them and best wishes to the developers in coming up with a project that will be a welcome new neighbor, not a resented intruder, in one of Key West's most important historic areas.

— The Citizen

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE