LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
In addition to nearly all the newspapers in the Keys, papers elsewhere in Florida are editorializing against lifting the Critical Concern designation for the Keys.  (And 82% of the Keys populace recently surveyed oppose removing it.)  This editorial is from the March 29 Palm Beach Post:

Protect the Florida Keys

Palm Beach Post Editorial

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Most readers of this or any other newspaper in the state do not live in the Florida Keys. So why should they care if the Legislature drops its oversight of the Keys to let local officials take over?

Because in the 30 years that they has been an Area of Critical State Concern, the Keys have been spared overdevelopment that local officials might have allowed, as they have elsewhere. The state has contributed by spending hundreds of millions to buy and preserve unique, irreplaceable habitat in a part of Florida that belongs to all Floridians, many of whom enjoy it as vacationers. The Keys contain four national wildlife refuges, 22 threatened and endangered species, 6,000 species of marine life, the third-largest coral reef in the world and more than 80,000 full-time human residents.

Development, though, has taken a toll. Sewage has contaminated nearby waters, septic systems are antiquated; and an overzealous Monroe County Commission is a constant threat to wildlife habitat. And that's with state oversight.

State Rep. Ken Sorensen, R-Key Largo, wants to take away that oversight. His House Bill 1299 has the support of the Monroe County Commission. Under the commission, a work plan meant to assure adequate sewer and stormwater coverage has been extended to cover five years, then seven and now 10, with little progress to show for the talk.

The state has acted as a counterbalance to the political feuds that threaten the Keys. Last year, Gov. Bush and the Cabinet refused to allow a sewer construction deal, part of a trade-off to allow affordable homes. Frustrated by the dueling political camps, the governor called the local governments "a pain in the butt to deal with." Still, Rep. Sorensen, who is in his last session because of term limits, claims to have the governor's support.

In its 2005 annual report, the state Department of Community Affairs identified four remaining critical needs for the Keys: water quality, habitat protection, affordable housing and hurricane evacuation. A carrying capacity analysis has limited construction to 250 new homes per year and identified an inventory of ready-to-develop, previously cleared lots that could last 14 years. Still, the Monroe commission seeks new lands to develop.

A campaign opposing Rep. Sorensen's bill contends that state oversight keeps the Keys from turning into an extension of Miami, with high-rise-lined waterfronts and more crowding. In a hopeful sign, the Monroe commission's attorney warned, according to The Key West Citizen, that a recent amendment to the bill is "so broad that you might as well still be designated."

There's an easier way of assuring that state protection continues. Don't pass Rep. Sorensen's bill.

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE