LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
It's ridiculous and shameful to pit neighborhood against neighborhood over ingress and egress for the Truman Waterfront.  It's a no-brainer: if Key West wants to reduce traffic to the Truman Waterfront, it needs to reduce allowable development under the plan.  Letter-to-editor from the January 19 Key West Citizen:
Reduce waterfront traffic by reducing development

If there is one thing that everyone impacted by the Truman Waterfront can agree on, it's that they don't want the heavy influx of associated traffic routed through their neighborhood. At a time when nobody in Key West can seem to agree on anything, on this single issue, there is complete consensus.

Development begets traffic. Previous city commissions, with the aid of city staff, embarked on a plan for the Truman Waterfront which embraced development. It is long past time that the nonprofit organization Last Stand should finally receive recognition it is due for the role it played in scaling back the massive plan originally proposed for this site. If you think the traffic plan is bad now, just imagine two cruise ship piers and hundreds of thousands of additional square feet of retail and office space, plus high-rise parking garages on the waterfront.

Nearly 10 years ago, the City Commission selected a consulting firm with deep connections to the cruise ship industry to develop a plan for the property the city hoped to acquire from the Navy. At the same meeting, a reputable planning firm was passed over because they actually told our city leaders that the parcel had negligible commercial value since its only entrance and egress were over narrow streets which ran through traditional, established neighborhoods. The Boston firm, with impressive base reuse experience, told the commission that the land was best suited for passive parks and recreation. ...

After hundreds of hours of public charettes and meetings, the firm produced a plan that called for a virtual city-within-a-city. ...

Over objections of city staff, Last Stand pushed for the conveyance of a larger percentage of land to transfer to the city at no cost, to be maintained for public use in perpetuity. Even though a city agent insisted that the Department of Interior would never approve the request, he was instructed to submit it. And damned if the federal government wasn't willing to give Key West the land for free, on the condition that it would become and remain a park. ...

The Key West Commission, in the meantime, with little public notice, proceeded to amend the original conveyance application to omit the public park requirement from much of the land which the federal government had already agreed to transfer at no cost. ...

If the current Key West City Commission is honestly interested in reducing traffic to the Truman Waterfront, it needs to look at a reduction in the allowable development permitted under the plan. It's hard to admit that wrong decisions were made in the past. ...

The new city commission has the ability to correct some of the excesses of the past. I hope that they have the good sense to take a second look at some past decisions which, unless checked, will be kicking us in the pants for a long time to come.

Elliot Baron

Chapel Hill, N.C.

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE