DCA secretary agrees with judge
By Alyson Crean
acrean@keynoter.comTier system to be
tweaked a little more
Local environmentalists are lauding a decision by
the Florida Department of Community Affairs they say will go a
long way to preserving Keys habitat.
In a final order issued on Sept. 26, DCA Secretary Tom Pelham
denied several challenges to an administrative law judge's
recommended order that came out in June.
Pelham's order finalizes a ruling by Administrative Law Judge
Donald Alexander, which will force the county to revise some
aspects of its controversial tier land-mapping system.
Pelham upheld the judge's ruling that the tier system's
four-acre threshold for protection is arbitrary.
“This means they will have to reexamine some of the maps,” said
Dennis Henize, a board member of Last Stand. “The judge was
clear that the maps must be based on science rather than just
boundaries based on arbitrary acreage.”
The county has been working for close to three years to
institute the tier system, which would control growth in the
coming years.
It categorizes vacant parcels into one of three tiers based upon
environmental sensitivity, Tier 1 being the most sensitive and
Tier 3 the most desirable for building. The system is designed
to replace the county's rate-of-growth ordinance, which controls
growth based upon a point system and hurricane evacuation times.
In 2006, Last Stand and the Florida Keys Citizens Coalition
challenged the proposed tier system, saying it does not do
enough to protect sensitive Keys habitat. Together, they filed
the challenge to it with the state's Division of Administrative
Hearings.
Alexander ruled on the challenge June 16.
Pelham's order upholds all of the judge's findings and denies
two requests each by the environmentalist groups and the county
to modify the recommended order.
In one, Last Stand and the Citizens Coalition asked that
“certain parcels be given a Tier 1 designation because they
contain wetlands,” Pelham wrote in the final order.
He denied the request, saying wetlands are adequately protected
in the county's land plan. |