LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
In a close vote, Key West's Planning Board approved the Watermark project last night.  From the Key West Citizen, March 4, 2005:

Planners OK Bight project

BY TIMOTHY O'HARA

Citizen Staff

KEY WEST — The city Planning Board, on Thursday night, recommended approving a luxury condo complex in the Key West Bight called Watermark.

Planning Board members Richard Klitenick, Patricia Eables and Bill Mauldin voted in favor of the project. Bill Verge and Paul Tagliaferri voted against the project. The project was conditionally approved for 25 units, not 26, and with some lowered roofs. The board's vote is a recommendation to the City Commission, which can ultimately deny or approve the project.

Watermark developer and Conch Derek Parker put forth a passionate request for support of the project. He cited his family's long history in the town and said that a corporation he is partners in, Cortex Companies, is not run by "greedy out-of-town developers." Several buildings in town are named after members of his family, including City Hall and a building at the airport. Developer Everett Atwell, Realtor Ralph Sanchez and attorney Tim Koenig are partners in the company, and all come from Conch families. The project is being developed locally by the four under the name Caroline Street Partners.

His company has tried to work with neighbors, and scaled down the project several times, he said. The project in recent months went from 81 units to roughly 30 to 26 and finally 25 units. The partners have also recently agreed to lower the roofs on several buildings.

"We have reduced the project density to fall within the city guidelines," Parker said. "We are merely working within the parameters put to us ....To the neighbors, we will continue to work with you."

Many longtime residents and Conchs packed the meeting hall Thursday night to speak in support of the project. Paul Worthington, owner of the neighboring Schooner Wharf Bar, also spoke in favor of the most recent proposal of the Watermark.

"The silent majority is no longer silent," the group's attorney, Jim Hendrick, said after hearing applause from the Conchs and long-time residents.

The Cortex Group also put forth a sophisticated computer generated presentation that showed different angles of the Watermark project and how it fit in with the many commercial waterfront buildings in the Key West Bight. The presentation refuted assertions made by many residents and a model built by local architect Bill Rowan. Rowan's model depicted the four Watermark condo buildings as out of scale with neighboring old conch homes and remodeled bordering houses. Many spoke and wrote letters in opposition to the project, stating the two of the buildings still exceed the city's height requirements and floor area ratio guidelines. Buildings in that district can only be 35 feet high unless they have a pitched roof, which allows the building an extra 5 feet. Opponents claim that the buildings do not have pitched roofs as developers claim. Buildings there also can not exceed 2 1/2 stories, local attorney Bob Goldman said. Some of the buildings exceed that, Goldman said.

"If you fall off those buildings, you still fall four stories" Goldman said, citing one neighbor's argument. "We ask that this development comply with the law."

The Caroline Street Partners offered an alternative to the current plan for the Watermark condominium complex, which will be housed at the site of old Jabour's Trailer Court & Campground. The group may still implement the current plan, which calls for 26 $1 million-plus condos housed in four buildings. The alternative calls for 25 units. The penthouse would be removed from the top and the under-condo parking removed along Lazy Way and William Street. This would drop the peak of the building from 40 to 28 feet. Underneath parking would also be removed from another building that would drop the peak of that roof from 40 to 36 1/2 feet, City Planner Ty Symroski said.

Opponents of the project said reducing the average height is unimportant if other buildings on the property still exceed height regulations.

tohara@keysnews.com

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE