LAST STAND

 
 
 

Visit us on Facebook

 
 

Home

About Us

Hot Topics

Calendar

Donations  

Join Us!

What's New?

Our Stands

Green Links

Last Stand Blog

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS
This letter-to-editor, regarding the Watermark decision, was in the May 11 Key West Citizen.  It's a concise explanation of why the project does not comply with the rules that apply.
Watermark decision was wrong under law

The undersigned is counsel to the neighbors and other protesters of the size of the Watermark development at the site of the Jabour trailer park. This letter is in direct response to Commissioner Oosterhoudt's diatribe in [the April 30] newspaper rationalizing his own vote in favor of the project. The Commissioner used one-eighth of the editorial page to make his case.

However, he missed the one and only issue that concerns what appears to be an overwhelming majority of his district:

Does the development comply with the law?

It clearly does not. City code Section 102-2 incorporates the [Historic Architectural Review Commission] Guidelines into the Code itself. The language is clear: "...Prior to obtaining a building permit, an applicant for development shall comply with the city's Historical Architectural Review Commission's Design Guidelines in Key West's Historic District..."

The HARC Guidelines themselves at page 38 state that "New Construction ... must not exceed 2.5 stories ..."

At the recent City Commission meeting on April 19, Commissioners Oosterhoudt, Scales, Bethel and Menendez voted to approve the 26-unit project notwithstanding the City Planner's admission that it violates the law.

When asked directly by me at the said Commission meeting "pursuant to the City Code of Ordinances how many stories are contained in Buildings 3 and 4 of the Watermark Development" Ty Symroski stated unequivocally that they were "3 stories over parking". Three stories over parking exceeds the maximum of 2.5 stories and exceeds the law.

There are also multiple technical issues which will be raised in forthcoming appeals and arguments for extraordinary writs, such as whether or not the developers are entitled to any transient rental units, whether or not the city is authorized to issue building permits pursuant to [the rate of growth ordinance], Floor Area Ratio, and whether a pending HARC appeal prevents the City Commission from voting on the matter at all (and the due process violation). We will also prove that all four Watermark buildings are all four stories according to the city code; and that they are incompatible and out of proportion with the neighborhood.

It is now left up to the city's hearing officer and the circuit courts to enforce the city code.

Robert B. Goldman

Key West

RETURN TO HOT TOPICS

RETURN TO HOME PAGE